Human Rights and SARS-CoV-2 – some observations on a Public Emergency threating the Life of the Nation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25312/2391-5145.16/2021_06jpKeywords:
human rights, ECHR, public emergency, derogation of human rights, SARSCoV-2, threat to the life of the nationAbstract
This paper tackles the issue of derogation of State’s international obligations in the field of human rights protection. Although derogation clauses are often included in human rights treaties, their application is regarded as an exception rather than a rule and undergo strict scrutiny as to their legality. It is universally acknowledged that such derogation is allowed in the most severe of circumstances, usually referred as “war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation”. The Author therefore considers whether the global COVID-19 pandemic might be categorized as such and thereby justify the measures undertaken by States to stop the spread of the coronavirus.
Downloads
References
Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, Application no. 32446/96, ECtHR Judgment of 2 November 2004.
Aksoy v. Turkey, Application no. 21987/93, ECtHR Judgment of 18 December 1996.
Alparslan Altan v. Turkey, Application no. 12778/17, ECtHR Judgment of 16 April 2019.
Brannigan and McBride v. the United Kingdom, Applications no. 14553/89 and 14554/89, ECtHR Judgment of 26 May 1993.
Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 11209/84, 11234/84, 11266/84, 11386/85, ECtHR Judgment of 29 November 1988.
Committee of Ministers of Council of Europe Reply to the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe Recommendation np. 2125 (2018). Cyprus v. Turkey, Application no. 8007/77, European Commission on Human Rights Report, 1983. Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands v. Greece (the “Greek case”), European Commission on Human Rights Report, 1969.
Dzehtsiarou, K., COVID-19 and the European Convention on Human Rights, “The Strasbourg Observers”, 27 March 2020.
Georgia v. Russia (II), Application no. 38263/08, ECtHR Grand Chamber Judgment of 21 January 2021.
Greece v. United Kingdom, Application no. 176/56, “European Commission on Human Rights Report”, 1958 § 81.
Greene, A., States Should Declare a State of Emergency Using Article 15 ECHR to Confront the Coronavirus Pandemic, “The Strasbourg Observers”, 1 April 2020.
Hassan v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 29750/09, ECtHR Grand Chamber Judgment of 16 September 2014.
Ireland v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 5310/71, ECtHR Judgment of 18 January 1978.
Lawless v. Ireland (no.3), Application no. 332/57, ECtHR Judgment of 1 July 1961.
Marshall v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 41571/98, ECtHR Decision of 10 July 2001.
Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, Application no. 13237/17, ECtHR Judgment of 10 March 2018.
Molloy S., Covid-19 and Derogations Before the European Court of Human Rights, VerfBlog, 2020/4/10, https://verfassungsblog.de/covid-19-and-derogations-before-the-european-courtof-human-rights/, DOI: 10.17176/20200410-153051-0.
Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, Application no. 16538/17, ECtHR Judgment of 20 March 2018.
Sakık and Others v. Turkey, Applications no. 23878/94, 23879/94, 23880/94, 23881/94, 23882/94 and 23883/94 (joined), ECtHR Judgment of 26 November 1997.
Spinney, L., Pale rider: the Spanish flu of 1918 and how it changed the world, London, Vintage, 2018.
Yurttas v. Turkey, Applications no. 25143/94, 27098/95, ECtHR Judgment of 27 May 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Akademia Humanistyczno-Ekonomiczna w Łodzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
